Wikipedia plays quite a roll in my everyday digital life. For example, when I’m engaged in a conversation and I don’t understand the meaning to a certain thing brought up, it’s easy to pull out your phone and search it up online, get a definition on Wikipedia then be able to have an understanding or a refreshed memory of the topic then be able to simply chime into the conversation with clear understanding and better knowledge. Interesting how that works though because I personally find Wikipedia to not be the most reliable source of information. I believe choosing a different more reliable source such as a library, will have you feeling zero doubt with the information consumed through the books you read and researched for a direct source of correct information. Teachers have passed along their awareness about the potential risk of reading and receiving false information given within Wikipedia. You can read and refer to the writing skills but receive incorrect information about what you’ve just read. It’s known to lead reader’s into finding out 10 different things, negative or positive, false or true about a specific thing searched but doesn’t give you one direct source of key information like books in the library would. Therefore, I agree with my teachers opinions about being careful and not always relying on Wikipedia for correct information. Doesn’t mean each and every single thing you search and read is going to be false but it’s always better to go the safer route by going to your local public library to search and find the correct information within the books they offer.
Nicholl Small